Tummy Tuck Patient 01
Every tummy tuck we perform is shaped by the person sitting across from us, her...
Medically Reviewed By:
Dr. Kiran Polavarapu, board-certified plastic surgeon. Review date: May 25, 2026
Natural Breast Augmentation Case Study: Restoring Symmetry and Proportion
Natural Breast Augmentation Case Study: Restoring Symmetry and Proportion
This case study describes one Fort Worth breast augmentation patient’s experience with Dr. Kiran Polavarapu. The patient wanted a natural increase in size, was unsure of how large she wanted to go, and had pre-existing asymmetry along with mild tissue changes after breastfeeding. The case is shared to help prospective patients understand how a tailored consultation, careful evaluation of anatomy, and a thoughtful surgical plan are used to approach breast augmentation. Results vary from patient to patient.
The Patient’s Concern and Starting Point
This patient came to the consultation after being referred by another patient. Starting at an A cup, this patient in her 30s wanted to expand her wardrobe but was unsure of the exact size she wanted. Her primary concern was achieving a very natural look and ensuring she did not appear "too large" or overdone.
For Dr. Polavarapu, that uncertainty was an important part of the planning process rather than a problem to rush past. The goal was to understand the look the patient wanted in her own clothes, how she wanted her proportions to feel, and which result would fit her body in a way that still looked natural.
Consultation and Sizing Goals: An Interview-First Approach
To work toward a proportional result, the procedure was planned around an individualized, interview-first consultation. Rather than starting with the exam or having the patient pick a number, Dr. Polavarapu first focused on understanding her daily routine, the clothes she wanted to wear, and the look she was working toward.
During this conversation, Dr. Polavarapu also discussed practical considerations that can shape long-term satisfaction, such as how implant weight may influence longevity of the result and how upper pole fullness, profile, and cup size goals translate into different planning ranges. Although cup size is not guaranteed by any plastic surgeon, talking through these preferences helps narrow the target.
After the interview, the physical exam included a careful review of anatomy, including nipple position, areolar shape, and asymmetries that can affect the final aesthetic outcome. The patient was then asked to try on a non-padded, non-push-up bra fitted with sizing inserts from the implant manufacturer’s sizing system. With the patient’s permission, two different volumes (about 100 cubic centimeters apart) were placed on opposite sides without revealing which was which, so she could evaluate her front and side views based on appearance rather than numbers.
This collaborative approach established a target range together, with the final, precise size selected in the operating room where skin elasticity, nipple position, and tissue thickness could be evaluated in person. Goal photos and the patient’s current photos were also referenced during surgery, since the patient herself was asleep and could not provide feedback at that point.
Treatment Plan: Restoring Symmetry After Pregnancy and Breastfeeding
A key part of the plan was working with her natural body contours and the changes brought on by breastfeeding. During the exam, Dr. Polavarapu noted mild scoliosis, which caused one shoulder to sit slightly higher and affected how her breasts rested on her chest wall. Her right breast was also naturally rounder and more shaped, while the left was slightly more deflated. She had developed mild tissue laxity near the areola after nursing, and her right nipple sat slightly elevated relative to the left.
For many patients, understanding how subtle pre-existing differences affect the final result is an important part of setting expectations. The patient remembered feeling fairly symmetric before breastfeeding, so the plan was built around recreating that sense of balance rather than introducing new differences. Acknowledging her anatomy upfront also allowed her to participate in decisions about what to address and what to leave alone.
Refined Techniques for a Natural Final Look
Rather than using two different implant sizes to address the asymmetry, Dr. Polavarapu opted for equal-sized implants in this case. In her experience, using two different sizes can lead to uneven weight distribution that contributes over time to bra fit issues, shoulder grooving, or shoulder and back discomfort, so she tries to avoid that approach unless there is a significant difference between sides. To work toward better balance with equal implants, she adjusted her technique intraoperatively and performed more targeted dissection on the more deflated left side to bring it closer to the right.
Careful attention was also given to preserving the patient’s natural anatomy. Because added volume can cause nipples to project more, especially when there is postpartum laxity in the areola, Dr. Polavarapu discussed the option of a nipple reduction. In this patient’s case, she advised against an additional procedure, prioritizing the protection of nipple sensation over a small change in projection. That choice was made specifically for this patient based on her anatomy and goals, not as a universal rule.
Breast Augmentation Procedure Overview
For prospective patients reading this case, it can be helpful to know that breast augmentation is one of the most common cosmetic procedures in the United States and involves placing saline-filled or silicone gel-filled implants to increase breast size or restore volume lost after pregnancy or weight changes (American Society of Plastic Surgeons; U.S. Food and Drug Administration). Implant type, size, shell texture, profile, incision location, and implant pocket placement are all decisions that depend on individual anatomy and goals.
Breast implants are not considered lifetime devices and may need to be replaced at some point. The FDA recommends that patients considering implants review the device manufacturer’s patient decision checklist with their surgeon and discuss risks, alternatives, and follow-up care before scheduling a procedure.
Recovery and Follow-Up Context
This case is primarily helpful as a planning, sizing, symmetry, and results discussion rather than as a recovery timeline. Recovery after breast augmentation varies based on the patient, implant choice, surgical approach, tissue characteristics, and post-operative instructions. Patients should follow their surgeon's specific aftercare plan and ask during consultation what activity restrictions, follow-up visits, and support needs may apply to their own case.
Her Breast Augmentation Surgery Results
In this patient’s case, the result was proportional breasts, a more balanced appearance that worked with her existing asymmetry, and a more comfortable fit in the clothing she had brought to her consultation. She reported being pleased with how she looked, both on the side and from the front, without feeling that the result was overdone.
Outcomes vary for every patient, which is why the broader collection of breast augmentation before-and-after photos is worth reviewing alongside this story to keep expectations grounded in real, individualized results.
Why This Case May Be Helpful for Prospective Patients
Prospective patients may find this case study useful for a few reasons. First, it shows what an interview-first consultation looks like in practice, which can be a contrast to consultations that begin with sizing and numbers. Second, it illustrates how pre-existing asymmetry, mild scoliosis, and postpartum changes can be acknowledged and worked with rather than ignored or hidden. Third, it shows how a surgeon may decline an optional procedure, such as a nipple reduction, when the benefit does not outweigh the trade-off in sensation for that specific patient.
Patients considering breast augmentation in Fort Worth may want to bring clothes they would like to fill out to their consultation, ask how their surgeon approaches sizing, ask how asymmetry will be evaluated and addressed, and ask which optional procedures are appropriate or not appropriate for their anatomy.
Why Patients Choose Dr. Kiran Polavarapu
Dr. Kiran Polavarapu approaches breast augmentation with a deliberately patient-centered consultation process, careful evaluation of anatomy, and a willingness to adjust technique intraoperatively to support a balanced result. As described in this case, that included planning around mild scoliosis, addressing asymmetry through tissue dissection rather than mismatched implant sizes, and protecting nipple sensation. Prospective patients are encouraged to review the Dr. Kiran Polavarapu’s background and bring their own goals and questions to a consultation so the plan can be tailored to them.
The best doctor in Fort Worth ! Dr. Polavarapo gave me the best confidence I could imagine! I’m so happy for my breast augmentation! I love it so much ! I recommended her to lot of my friends . I’m so much happy . Can’t wait to wear all my cute outfits .. the girls in her office are amazing ! The people in surgery center are all amazing! Love you all ! Muah
Raquel Greenlee
General Implant Safety Note
Breast implants require an informed discussion about implant type, size, risks, benefits, and follow-up. Patients considering breast implants can review the FDA breast implant surgery resources and should bring questions about safety, recovery, implant longevity, and screening to their consultation.
Schedule a Breast Augmentation Consultation in Fort Worth
If this patient’s story reflects what you have been hoping to address, we would be glad to talk through your own goals in person. To meet with Dr. Kiran Polavarapu and design a breast augmentation treatment plan tailored to your body, please call our Fort Worth office at 817-615-8576 or schedule a consultation through our contact page.
Frequently Asked Questions
Have a specific question? Contact us!
Disclaimer
This case study illustrates one patient’s experience. Results vary from patient to patient. The information in this article is intended for general educational purposes and is not a substitute for an individual consultation. Before-and-after photos shown elsewhere on this site reflect individual outcomes and are not a guarantee of results in any other patient. Candidacy for breast augmentation, implant choice, and surgical planning are determined during a personal consultation based on anatomy, goals, and medical history.
Patient Case Studies
